A forthcoming MSCI ruling on whether to exclude Strategy Inc. (formerly MicroStrategy) from major equity indices may define the future of corporate Bitcoin adoption, according to an analysis published this week.
The report argues that the company’s capital structure has reached a point where its ability to function hinges on the outcome of the Jan. 15 index review, a decision that could trigger billions of dollars in passive outflows and force a structural reset of the firm’s Bitcoin-levered model.
MSCI is evaluating whether companies with more than half their assets in digital currencies should remain eligible for benchmark inclusion.
Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings accounted for roughly 77% of its total assets at last report, placing it well above the proposed threshold.
If removed, analysts at JPMorgan estimate as much as $2.8 billion could exit through MSCI-linked passive funds alone, and up to $8.8 billion if other index providers follow suit.
According to the analysis authored by independent researcher Shanaka Anslem Perera, this decision is not simply another governance event but a mechanical fulcrum.
Forced outflows could push Strategy’s equity below its net asset value, eliminating the premium that has allowed the company to raise low-cost capital to expand its Bitcoin position.
Also Read: Long Bitcoin, Short Strategy: Citron Says Its Call ‘Aged Well’ as Stock Falls 68% in a Year
Without an equity premium, the report argues, Strategy would lose its ability to issue accretive stock or debt, placing pressure on its cash flows and preferred dividend obligations.
Perera’s assessment characterizes Strategy’s capital structure as operating near a boundary condition: a model that has worked only as long as capital markets remain open, Bitcoin prices trend upward, and the stock maintains index inclusion.
“Once equilibrium is lost,” the report notes, “the reflexive structure inverts.”
Falling share prices reduce access to capital, and loss of capital access increases the likelihood of asset sales, a cycle that could impose market impact on Strategy’s own Bitcoin holdings.
The analysis also highlights a broader risk: that Strategy’s corporate architecture resembles a sovereign-scale reserve strategy built on balance-sheet tools that lack sovereign protections.
Corporate liabilities require refinancing on monthly and quarterly cycles, while Bitcoin investment horizons are measured in decades.
If index removal and capital-market tightening coincide with even a temporary drawdown in Bitcoin, Perera warns the model may not be able to withstand the liquidity shock.
Three scenarios are outlined. In the most likely outcome, a base case estimated at 60–70% probability, MSCI proceeds with exclusion, prompting a multi-month deleveraging in early 2026.
A more severe scenario envisions index exclusion combined with a market downturn, forcing large Bitcoin sales into thin liquidity.
The optimistic case, considered least probable, assumes MSCI delays or revises its criteria.
Beyond Strategy itself, the analysis suggests the decision carries broader implications for public companies holding crypto assets.
If Strategy withstands exclusion and maintains its model, it could validate a new corporate category: the “Bitcoin treasury company.”
If it does not, it may reinforce the limits of applying corporate liability structures to large-scale digital asset reserves. MSCI’s consultation runs through Dec. 31, with results due on Jan. 15.
The reconstitution would occur in February.
Whether Strategy’s approach represents the future of corporate finance or a structural limit will become clearer within months.
Read Next: Michael Saylor Says Strategy Can Survive an 80–90% Bitcoin Crash
