A quiet policy battle is unfolding behind the scenes in Washington, and this time crypto companies are moving first.
More than 125 firms have coordinated a response to what they see as an attempt by the banking industry to curtail one of stablecoins’ most attractive features: customer rewards.
Key Takeaways
More than 125 crypto companies are pushing back against banking efforts to restrict stablecoin reward programs.
The industry says the GENIUS Act intentionally allows platforms – not issuers – to offer rewards.
Crypto firms argue the dispute is about competition, not consumer safety, as banks move closer to issuing stablecoins.
In a joint letter delivered to Congress, a broad coalition of crypto companies warned lawmakers against revisiting provisions of the GENIUS Act that govern stablecoin rewards. The group argues that recent lobbying by traditional banks is aimed at narrowing the law in a way that would weaken competition and entrench incumbent financial institutions.
Tyler Winklevoss, co-founder of Gemini, framed the effort as an attempt to reopen an issue lawmakers already resolved. In his view, banks are seeking regulatory changes not to improve safety, but to limit how crypto platforms compete for users.
How the Law Was Designed to Work
The GENIUS Act deliberately separates stablecoin issuers from platforms that distribute them. Issuers are prohibited from paying interest, a restriction meant to avoid bank-like risk. Platforms, on the other hand, are allowed to offer rewards using their own revenue streams.
According to the crypto coalition, this structure was not accidental. It was crafted to protect the financial system while still allowing innovation at the platform level. The group compares stablecoin rewards to familiar payment incentives, such as credit card cash-back programs, which exist without banks paying interest on deposits.
Banks Push Back as Stablecoins Go Mainstream
Banking groups now argue that rewards offered by platforms should be restricted just like issuer-paid interest, claiming both pose similar risks. Crypto firms reject that comparison, saying it blurs the distinction between who issues money and who builds consumer-facing products on top of it.
The dispute comes at a sensitive moment. U.S. banks are increasingly signaling interest in launching their own stablecoins, raising concerns among crypto firms that regulatory pressure is being used as a competitive tool rather than a safety measure.
Why Rewards Matter to Users
The coalition’s letter highlights a practical reality for consumers. Traditional checking and savings accounts offer minimal returns, while stablecoin reward programs often provide meaningfully higher yields. Removing those incentives, the group argues, would make digital dollars less attractive just as adoption is accelerating.
Major exchanges including Coinbase and Kraken have joined Gemini in backing the letter, which was organized by the Blockchain Association and sent to leaders of the Senate Banking Committee.
A Competition Fight Disguised as Risk Management
Crypto firms insist the debate is not about consumer protection. From their perspective, limiting platform rewards would concentrate power among a handful of large banks while squeezing smaller fintech and crypto players out of the market.
They also point out the inconsistency: banks themselves offer rewards through cards and payment programs without regulatory backlash. That, the coalition argues, exposes the real issue – fear of competition rather than financial instability.
What’s at Stake for Crypto Regulation
Reopening the GENIUS Act, the letter warns, would inject uncertainty into a space that depends heavily on clear rules. Regulatory ambiguity could slow innovation, deter investment, and delay stablecoin adoption at a critical stage.
The standoff highlights a broader tension shaping U.S. crypto policy. With market structure legislation already struggling to gain bipartisan momentum, stablecoin rewards have become a flashpoint between legacy finance and digital-native firms.
For now, the banking industry has not formally responded. But the crypto sector’s message is unmistakable: stablecoin rewards are a deliberate part of the regulatory framework – and the industry is prepared to fight to keep them that way.
