A Ukrainian local politician is facing criminal charges for hiding nearly $5 million worth of crypto assets from financial disclosures.
This is the latest case showcasing a significant systemic weakness in Ukraine’s anti-corruption oversight and how it tracks cryptocurrency declarations.
Deputy Accused of Hiding $4.7 Million in Crypto Assets
Authorities are investigating a Poltava City Council officer suspected of deliberately making false statements on his mandatory financial disclosures.
Reports indicate that Deputy Oleksandr Kalutskyi failed to declare cryptocurrency totaling over 200 million hryvnia, or approximately $4.77 million. The concealed assets allegedly belonged to both Kalutskyi and his close relatives.
The failure to declare the cryptocurrency spanned three consecutive years, from 2022 to 2024. Although Kalutskyi later submitted updated financial documents for 2025 listing some virtual assets, investigations by Ukraine’s Security Service and the National Police determined that this revised data was also unreliable.
If convicted, Kalutskyi faces up to two years in prison and the potential inability to hold public office for up to three years.
A Blind Spot in Financial Oversight Exposed
The criminal investigation into Kalutskyi highlights a particular vulnerability in Ukraine’s anti-corruption framework.
Last month, Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Agency (NAPC) revealed that it does not keep separate records or statistics for cryptocurrency assets listed in declarations or false crypto disclosures.
Public officials must list digital assets under an “intangible assets” section. However, the NAPC confirmed that its internal systems are not currently designed to specifically account for this information.
The absence of a dedicated NAPC crypto-tracking mechanism may make it easier for public officials to misrepresent digital asset ownership. Kalutskyi’s case was reportedly exposed not through the NAPC’s routine review process but by cyber specialists from the Security Service and National Police investigators.
The need to rely on specialized law enforcement units to track down crypto-related corruption suggests that the NACP’s current approach to tax evasion has a blind spot regarding virtual assets.
