The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act Senate Banking Committee markup, scheduled for Thursday, May 14 at 10:30 AM ET, is arriving under the heaviest coordinated lobbying pressure in the bill’s legislative history: over 100 amendments filed, the American Bankers Association flooding Senate offices with more than 8,000 letters since last Friday, and Senator Elizabeth Warren submitting 40-plus amendments before Tuesday’s 5 PM filing deadline.

This is not simply a high volume of amendments; it is a procedural offensive designed to force politically unworkable votes, slow floor scheduling, and either reshape the bill beyond recognition or collapse the markup entirely, the same mechanism that killed the January attempt after 137 amendments were filed.

The binary is clear: either the Clarity Act advances out of committee Thursday, even on a party-line vote, and keeps the federal crypto framework alive, or the banking lobby’s amendment flood succeeds, and the US cedes another legislative cycle to offshore issuers.

The stablecoin market, currently anchored by Circle USDC as the dominant regulated dollar-pegged asset, is waiting on exactly this outcome.

Clarity Act News: What the 100-Amendment Offensive Actually Does

U.S. Senate Banking Committee Receives Over 100 Amendments to Crypto Market Structure Bill

According to Politico, ahead of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee’s markup vote on the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, committee members have submitted more than 100… pic.twitter.com/6yH0SH7Rgc

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) May 13, 2026

Amendment-flooding serves as a scheduling tactic, as each amendment requires debate time and individual votes, creating a record of sensitive positions ahead of midterms. The January markup failed under 137 amendments without a vote, and Thursday’s session faces a similar fate.

The American Bankers Association specifically targets Section 404 of the CLARITY Act, which allows activity-based rewards for stablecoin holders but prohibits deposit-equivalent interest.

They argue it creates loopholes that could lead to significant deposit migration from banks to crypto platforms, potentially reducing bank loan capacity by over 20%. The rewards clause impacts what stablecoin issuers like Circle can offer under federal guidelines.

Senator Warren’s amendments take a broader approach, notably one that would prevent crypto firms from accessing Federal Reserve master accounts, hindering their participation in the US payment infrastructure.

Senators Reed and Smith have introduced an amendment against the CLARITY Act that presents a binary choice: support crypto utility or maintain traditional banking protections, a tactic aimed at forcing a recorded vote for campaign messaging.

Why Institutional Capital Has Been Waiting for Exactly This Moment

The Clarity Act would create the first federal framework for digital commodity oversight in US history, placing the CFTC in charge of decentralized blockchains and requiring exchanges and brokers to obtain defined licenses.

This legal clarity is crucial for institutional compliance, allowing firms to treat USDC as a balance-sheet-grade asset. Additionally, the Act includes DeFi safe-harbor provisions that would protect software developers from broker-dealer registration and ensure the viability of US-domiciled protocol development.

Currently, prediction markets show a 60% chance of the Clarity Act passing by 2026, down from 66% earlier this year due to banking pushback. While Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse previously estimated a passage probability of 80-90%, that now seems overly optimistic.

Senator Tim Scott is hopeful of passage before the midterms, but Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s withdrawal of support raises concerns that the bill could expand the SEC’s authority at the expense of the CFTC.

The Opposing Coalition: Banks, Crypto Firms, and What Each Side Wants

The ABA is concerned about deposit migration, projecting a 20%-plus reduction in loan capacity if stablecoin adoption grows, which they see as a systemic risk to credit availability. They are targeting yield provisions that make stablecoin accounts competitive with bank deposits for retail savers.

However, Galaxy Digital’s research contradicts this, indicating that 60-70% of growth under the GENIUS Act comes from offshore capital repatriation, not domestic deposit switching.

This data supports the crypto industry’s claim that stablecoin regulation enhances the dollar’s global reach rather than harming domestic banks. Therefore, the Crypto Legislation debate is about capturing offshore dollar flows versus losing them to non-US issuers.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer recently urged Democratic members to support a yes vote for the CLARITY Act, contingent on progress in ethics negotiations. This suggests potential cooperation from Democrats is still possible.