In Trump crypto news today, the President recently endorsed the multi-billion-dollar prediction markets industry on Truth Social, specifically naming Polymarket and Kalshi.
He praised CFTC Chairman Michael Selig for asserting federal jurisdiction over event contracts and criticized several state officials for their efforts to ban these platforms.
This endorsement marks a significant intervention in the ongoing federal-state jurisdictional conflict, with the CFTC already suing multiple attorneys general to assert preemption over state gambling bans.
The key question now is whether Trump’s backing, along with the CFTC’s aggressive stance, will provide a sustainable framework for oracle-dependent DeFi protocols and on-chain event markets, or risk introducing regulatory capture that could decrease asset values.
?????? ?. ????? ????? ?????? ???? – ??:?? ?? ??? ??.??.??
?Trump just went to bat for America’s booming prediction markets and crypto industry, making it clear the CFTC must keep full control.
He slammed "scum" like Chris Christie,… pic.twitter.com/NQSmO9m15f
— Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) May 26, 2026
Trump Crypto News: What the President’s Prediction Markets Endorsement Means
Prediction markets serve as decentralized information aggregation mechanisms that price the probabilities of real-world outcomes by pooling capital from participants with varying levels of information.
Platforms like Polymarket use on-chain settlement via oracle networks, such as Chainlink and Pyth, to feed verified data into smart contracts for payouts, reducing reliance on centralized intermediaries.
This intersection with DeFi infrastructure highlights the importance of regulatory clarity for event contracts, which would also validate the oracle protocols involved in their settlements.
Trump’s May 26 statement shifts the federal-state jurisdictional debate toward executive priority, with CFTC Chair Selig indicating that the agency will actively assert its authority over these markets.
Trump’s support strengthens the CFTC’s position against state attorneys general, impacting the likelihood of favorable outcomes in ongoing litigation, such as the Ninth Circuit case involving Nevada’s temporary restraining order against Kalshi.
A CFTC victory in these cases could nationalize event contracts under federal oversight, streamlining regulation and potentially attracting institutional investment into on-chain prediction markets.
Why Trump’s Endorsement Now Functions as a Dual-Reading Risk Signal for DeFi Allocators
BREAKING: ?? Trump says prediction markets should stay under CFTC authority
calls them a new form of financial market
says the US needs to stay on top of prediction markets and crypto
Kalshi era is getting loud ? pic.twitter.com/5uiE84ndfY
— WallStreetBets (@wallstreetbets) May 26, 2026
The risk-on interpretation of Trump’s intervention in crypto regulation suggests that a presidential endorsement of a specific regulatory framework, combined with a proactive CFTC litigation campaign, signals a positive environment for institutional investors who have been hesitant due to enforcement uncertainties.
This endorsement could boost on-chain event markets, particularly Polymarket, which already saw record trading volumes in 2026, and could have positive effects on oracle protocols and settlement layers.
Conversely, the risk-off perspective highlights potential conflicts of interest, as Donald Trump Jr. advises both Kalshi and Polymarket, and the Trump family plans to launch its own prediction market, Truth Predict.
Some former CFTC staff have indicated that the current regulatory stance may protect politically connected crypto entities, raising concerns about regulatory capture.
If courts determine that the CFTC’s actions were politically motivated, the consequences could undermine platforms that relied on federal protection without considering legitimacy issues.
Both interpretations are grounded in the same facts, but the ultimate resolution depends on upcoming federal court decisions that will clarify jurisdiction and political influences behind the CFTC’s actions.
What the PredictIt Wind-Down and Prior CFTC Jurisdiction Debates Tell Us About the Current Re-Rating
(SOURCE: TradingView)
In other Trump crypto news, the recent federal-state conflict over prediction markets is notable, especially following the CFTC’s actions against PredictIt, which led to the platform’s closure in 2024.
This highlighted that no-action letters from the CFTC lack durability without formal rulemaking, prompting platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket to seek clearer federal authorization.
Currently, under the Selig administration, the CFTC is pursuing federal lawsuits to assert jurisdiction over event contracts as federally regulated swaps, in contrast to the previous administration’s confusing jurisdictional claims that hindered compliance and institutional participation in DeFi.
The CFTC’s 2022 settlement with Polymarket set a baseline for U.S. user access, which the current regulatory push aims to reverse. The CLARITY Act is also advancing, potentially codifying CFTC jurisdiction over event contracts.
For a re-rating of DeFi, particularly oracle-dependent protocols, to occur, two key events must happen: a favorable court ruling for CFTC pre-emption and increased institutional participation in on-chain event markets, both measurable through protocol-level data.
